Immediately after arresting Sandra Bland, Officer Encinia called in a description of what preceded the arrest and the arrest itself to a supervisor. In the video below there's minute to minute comparison of what white officer Brian Encinia said happened versus what the dash cam recorded happening.
This side by side comparison of the dash cam video and the audio of Encinia's call to his supervisor clearly shows that Encinia knew he had no right to arrest Bland. If Sandra Bland's behavior had been justification to arrest her on its own, he wouldn't have had to lie about about her behavior.
It's not like he remembered things incorrectly. He told this lie immediately following the arrest. Then he lied on his arrest affidavit too.
 |
| Encinia's Incomplete and/or False Arrest Affidavit Of Sandra Bland |
Read A Clearer Version Of Brian T Encinia's Arrest Report Here.
http://www.click2houston.com/blob/view/-/34278084/data/1/-/12ecbc7/-/Bland-Affidavit.pdf
1) Officer Brian Encinia ought to lose his job for the lying all by itself.
2) Officer Brian Encinia ought to lose his second amendment rights forever -making him unable to be a cop again
3) Even if the suicide ruling sticks, an unintentional death in the commission of a crime makes that death your fault as I understand it. For example, if you are robbing a grocery store and somebody has a heart attack, you can be charged with that death. If the recent Supreme Court Ruling (Rodriguez v. United States ) means anything at all, then it ought to mean he broker the law. Lying in an affidavit may not be a "criminal" offense per se but false arrest should be.
"Rodriguez v. United States held that police could not extend the length of a routine traffic stop, even for just a few minutes, absent a safety related concern or reasonable suspicion to believe that the driver may have committed an additional crime. As Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg explained in the opinion of the Court, “[t]he tolerable duration of police inquiries in the traffic-stop context is determined by the seizure’s ‘mission’ — to address the traffic violation that warranted the stop, and attend to related safety concerns.” A police stop “may ‘last no longer than is necessary to effectuate th[at] purpose.’ Authority for the seizure thus ends when tasks tied to the traffic infraction are — or reasonably should have been — completed.”
By the time Encinia asks Bland to put out her cigarette, the “mission” of his encounter with Bland is almost at completion. He has already written the citation and brought it to Bland.READ MORE: http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2015/07/22/3683281/supreme-court-say-sandra-blands-arrest/
You don't get to use your power as a police officer to abuse people because they aren't bowing and scraping like a good n-word should. He abused his authority. He only had the right to go further if there was a safety issue---just as he lied about in his report. There wasn't more than a second between the time she asked why she should put out the cigarette and his demand that she get out of the car. A second isn't long enough to feel threatened, not even for a coward like him.
That demand, disguised as a request, to put out the cigarette was a set up to arrest her.
And yes, I call it assault up until the moment he told her (after she asked) that he was arresting her. He assaulted her before the word "arrest" came up.
I wouldn't be surprised if they put her in Cell 95, where the cell's phone didn't work, on purpose.
Encinia has done a lot more to deserve jail time than Sandra Bland ever did.
* * * * * * * *
Compare the truth of the dash cam video to Encinia's words for yourself. The video breaks it down so that it's very easy to hear the Encinia's lies.
There are dozens of videos of showing white people doing exactly what Encinia lied about. Watch the white cop's reaction to a white man's crazy reaction to a speeding ticket.
No comments:
Post a Comment